markov process real life examples

The policy then gives per state the best (given the MDP model) action to do. The second problem is that $ X_\tau $ may not be a valid random variable (that is, measurable) unless we assume that the stochastic process $ \bs{X} $ is measurable. Markov Jump Process So a Lvy process $ \bs{X} = \{X_t: t \in [0, \infty)\} $ on $ \R $ with these transition densities would be a Markov process with stationary, independent increments, and whose sample paths are continuous from the right and have left limits. Discrete-time Markov chain (or discrete-time discrete-state Markov process) 2. In particular, if $ X_0 $ has distribution $ \mu_0 $ (the initial distribution) then $ X_t $ has distribution $ \mu_t = \mu_0 P_t $ for every $ t \in T $. As with the regular Markov property, the strong Markov property depends on the underlying filtration $ \mathfrak{F} $. PageRank is one of the strategies Google uses to assess the relevance or value of a page. If you want to predict what the weather might be like in one week, you can explore the various probabilities over the next seven days and see which ones are most likely. processes In this lecture we shall brie y overview the basic theoretical foundation of DTMC. If the Markov chain includes N states, the matrix will be N x N, with the entry (I, J) representing the chance of migrating from the state I to state J. Suppose that $ \bs{X} = \{X_t: t \in T\} $ is a Markov process on an LCCB state space $ (S, \mathscr{S}) $ with transition operators $ \bs{P} = \{P_t: t \in [0, \infty)\} $. That is, $ \mathscr{F}_0 $ contains all of the null events (and hence also all of the almost certain events), and therefore so does $ \mathscr{F}_t $ for all $ t \in T $. These examples and corresponding transition graphs can help developing the skills to express problem using MDP. So, for example, the letter "M" has a 60 percent chance to lead to the letter "A" and a 40 percent chance to lead to the letter "I". Recall next that a random time $ \tau $ is a stopping time (also called a Markov time or an optional time) relative to $ \mathfrak{F} $ if $ \{\tau \le t\} \in \mathscr{F}_t $ for each $ t \in T $. 5 real-world use cases of the Markov chains - Analytics India WebBefore we give the denition of a Markov process, we will look at an example: Example 1: Suppose that the bus ridership in a city is studied. n This suggests that if one knows the processs current state, no extra knowledge about its previous states is needed to provide the best possible forecast of its future. In essence, your words are analyzed and incorporated into the app's Markov chain probabilities. However, this will generally not be the case unless $ \bs{X} $ is progressively measurable relative to $ \mathfrak{F} $, which means that $ \bs{X}: \Omega \times T_t \to S $ is measurable with respect to $ \mathscr{F}_t \otimes \mathscr{T}_t $ and $ \mathscr{S} $ where $ T_t = \{s \in T: s \le t\} $ and $ \mathscr{T}_t $ the corresponding Borel $ \sigma $-algebra. ), All you need is a collection of letters where each letter has a list of potential follow-up letters with probabilities. , That is, for $ n \in \N $ \[ \P(X_{n+2} \in A \mid \mathscr{F}_{n+1}) = \P(X_{n+2} \in A \mid X_n, X_{n+1}), \quad A \in \mathscr{S} \] where $ \{\mathscr{F}_n: n \in \N\} $ is the natural filtration associated with the process $ \bs{X} $. In any case, $ S $ is given the usual $ \sigma $-algebra $ \mathscr{S} $ of Borel subsets of $ S $ (which is the power set in the discrete case). Examples of Markov chains - Wikipedia Let $ Y_n = X_{t_n} $ for $ n \in \N $. If I know that you have $12 now, then it would be expected that with even odds, you will either have $11 or $13 after the next toss. That is, the state at time $ m + n $ is completely determined by the state at time $ m $ (regardless of the previous states) and the time increment $ n $. Recall again that since $ \bs{X} $ is adapted to $ \mathfrak{F} $, it is also adapted to $ \mathfrak{G} $. So we usually don't want filtrations that are too much finer than the natural one. Next, \begin{align*} \P[Y_{n+1} \in A \times B \mid Y_n = (x, y)] & = \P[(X_{n+1}, X_{n+2}) \in A \times B \mid (X_n, X_{n+1}) = (x, y)] \\ & = \P(X_{n+1} \in A, X_{n+2} \in B \mid X_n = x, X_{n+1} = y) = \P(y \in A, X_{n+2} \in B \mid X_n = x, X_{n + 1} = y) \\ & = I(y, A) Q(x, y, B) \end{align*}. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. It provides a way to model the dependencies of current information (e.g. States: The number of available beds {1, 2, , 100} assuming the hospital has 100 beds. X Note that for $ n \in \N $, the $ n $-step transition operator is given by $P^n f = f \circ g^n $. WebExamples in Markov Decision Processes is an essential source of reference for mathematicians and all those who apply the optimal control theory to practical purposes. So here's a crash course -- everything you need to know about Markov chains condensed down into a single, digestible article. For example, if the Markov process is in state A, then the probability it changes to state E is 0.4, while the probability it remains in state A is 0.6. {\displaystyle X_{t}} So we will often assume that a Feller Markov process has sample paths that are right continuous have left limits, since we know there is a version with these properties. 1 A Markov process is a random process indexed by time, and with the property that the future is independent of the past, given the present. Such real world problems show the usefulness and power of this framework. In particular, every discrete-time Markov chain is a Feller Markov process. A typical set of assumptions is that the topology on $ S $ is LCCB: locally compact, Hausdorff, and with a countable base. The result above shows how to obtain the distribution of $ X_t $ from the distribution of $ X_0 $ and the transition kernel $ P_t $ for $ t \in T $. Rewards: Play at level1, level2, , level10 generates rewards $10, $50, $100, $500, $1000, $5000, $10000, $50000, $100000, $500000 with probability p = 0.99, 0.9, 0.8, , 0.2, 0.1 respectively. Interesting, isn't it? Probability, Mathematical Statistics, and Stochastic Processes (Siegrist), { "16.01:_Introduction_to_Markov_Processes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.02:_Potentials_and_Generators_for_General_Markov_Processes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.03:_Introduction_to_Discrete-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.04:_Transience_and_Recurrence_for_Discrete-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.05:_Periodicity_of_Discrete-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.06:_Stationary_and_Limiting_Distributions_of_Discrete-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.07:_Time_Reversal_in_Discrete-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.08:_The_Ehrenfest_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.09:_The_Bernoulli-Laplace_Chain" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.10:_Discrete-Time_Reliability_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.11:_Discrete-Time_Branching_Chain" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.12:_Discrete-Time_Queuing_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.13:_Discrete-Time_Birth-Death_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.14:_Random_Walks_on_Graphs" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.15:_Introduction_to_Continuous-Time_Markov_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.16:_Transition_Matrices_and_Generators_of_Continuous-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.17:_Potential_Matrices" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.18:_Stationary_and_Limting_Distributions_of_Continuous-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.19:_Time_Reversal_in_Continuous-Time_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.20:_Chains_Subordinate_to_the_Poisson_Process" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.21:_Continuous-Time_Birth-Death_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.22:_Continuous-Time_Queuing_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16.23:__Continuous-Time_Branching_Chains" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Foundations" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Probability_Spaces" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Distributions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Expected_Value" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Special_Distributions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Random_Samples" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Point_Estimation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Set_Estimation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Hypothesis_Testing" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Geometric_Models" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Bernoulli_Trials" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Finite_Sampling_Models" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_Games_of_Chance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_The_Poisson_Process" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Renewal_Processes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Markov_Processes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "17:_Martingales" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "18:_Brownian_Motion" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "license:ccby", "authorname:ksiegrist", "licenseversion:20", "source@http://www.randomservices.org/random" ], https://stats.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fstats.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FProbability_Theory%2FProbability_Mathematical_Statistics_and_Stochastic_Processes_(Siegrist)%2F16%253A_Markov_Processes%2F16.01%253A_Introduction_to_Markov_Processes, $ \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}$ $ \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} $$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$ $ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$ $ \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$ $ \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$ $ \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$ $ \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$ $ \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$ $ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$ $ \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$ $ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$ $\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$ $ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$ $ \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$ $ \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$ $ \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$ $ \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$ $ \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$ $ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$ $ \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$ $ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$$\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}$, $\newcommand{\P}{\mathbb{P}}$ $\newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}}$ $\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$ $\newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}}$ $\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}$ $\newcommand{\bs}{\boldsymbol}$ $\newcommand{\var}{\text{var}}$, 16.2: Potentials and Generators for General Markov Processes, Stopping Times and the Strong Markov Property, Recurrence Relations and Differential Equations, Processes with Stationary, Independent Increments, differential equations and recurrence relations, source@http://www.randomservices.org/random, When $ T = \N $ and the state space is discrete, Markov processes are known as, When $ T = [0, \infty) $ and the state space is discrete, Markov processes are known as, When $ T = \N $ and $ S \ = \R $, a simple example of a Markov process is the partial sum process associated with a sequence of independent, identically distributed real-valued random variables. (T > 35)$, the probability that the overall process takes more than 35 time units to completion. This is the one-point compactification of $ T $ and is used so that the notion of time converging to infinity is preserved. Let $ t \mapsto X_t(x) $ denote the unique solution with $ X_0(x) = x $ for $ x \in \R $. It's easy to describe processes with stationary independent increments in discrete time. Markov A non-homogenous process can be turned into a homogeneous process by enlarging the state space, as shown below. If $ s, \, t \in T $ with $ 0 \lt s \lt t $, then conditioning on $ (X_0, X_s) $ and using our previous result gives \[ \P(X_0 \in A, X_s \in B, X_t \in C) = \int_{A \times B} \P(X_t \in C \mid X_0 = x, X_s = y) \mu_0(dx) P_s(x, dy)\] for $ A, \, B, \, C \in \mathscr{S} $. For $ t \in T $, let $ m_0(t) = \E(X_t - X_0) = m(t) - \mu_0 $ and $ v_0(t) = \var(X_t - X_0) = v(t) - \sigma_0^2$. If $ \bs{X} $ is a strong Markov process relative to $ \mathfrak{G} $ then $ \bs{X} $ is a strong Markov process relative to $ \mathfrak{F} $. We do know of such a process, namely the Poisson process with rate 1. A 20 percent chance that tomorrow will be rainy. We can treat this as a Poisson distribution with mean s. In this doc, we showed some examples of real world problems that can be modeled as Markov Decision Problem. They're simple yet useful in so many ways. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.org. The probability of For $ t \in (0, \infty) $, let $ g_t $ denote the probability density function of the normal distribution with mean 0 and variance $ t $, and let $ p_t(x, y) = g_t(y - x) $ for $ x, \, y \in \R $. This is represented by an initial state vector in which the "sunny" entry is 100%, and the "rainy" entry is 0%: The weather on day 1 (tomorrow) can be predicted by multiplying the state vector from day 0 by the transition matrix: Thus, there is a 90% chance that day 1 will also be sunny. If $ s, \, t \in T $ and $ f \in \mathscr{B} $ then \[ \E[f(X_{s+t}) \mid \mathscr{F}_s] = \E\left(\E[f(X_{s+t}) \mid \mathscr{G}_s] \mid \mathscr{F}_s\right)= \E\left(\E[f(X_{s+t}) \mid X_s] \mid \mathscr{F}_s\right) = \E[f(X_{s+t}) \mid X_s] \] The first equality is a basic property of conditional expected value. Just as with $ \mathscr{B} $, the supremum norm is used for $ \mathscr{C} $ and $ \mathscr{C}_0 $. WebConsider the process of repeatedly flipping a fair coin until the sequence (heads, tails, heads) appears. Suppose that $ s, \, t \in T $. Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated! The complexity of the theory of Markov processes depends greatly on whether the time space $ T $ is $ \N $ (discrete time) or $ [0, \infty) $ (continuous time) and whether the state space is discrete (countable, with all subsets measurable) or a more general topological space. Suppose that you start with $10, and you wager $1 on an unending, fair, coin toss indefinitely, or until you lose all of your money. Rewards: Fishing at certain state generates rewards, lets assume the rewards of fishing at state low, medium and high are $5K, $50K and $100k respectively. The weather on day 2 (the day after tomorrow) can be predicted in the same way, from the state vector we computed for day 1: In this example, predictions for the weather on more distant days change less and less on each subsequent day and tend towards a steady state vector. The person explains it ok but I just can't seem to get a grip on what it would be used for in real-life. Clearly, the topological and measure structures on $ T $ are not really necessary when $ T = \N $, and similarly these structures on $ S $ are not necessary when $ S $ is countable. to Markov Models We can accomplish this by taking $ \mathfrak{F} = \mathfrak{F}^0_+ $ so that $ \mathscr{F}_t = \mathscr{F}^0_{t+} $for $ t \in T $, and in this case, $ \mathfrak{F} $ is referred to as the right continuous refinement of the natural filtration. The theory of Markov processes is simplified considerably if we add an additional assumption. (This is always true in discrete time.). WebThus, there are four basic types of Markov processes: 1. Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Hence $(U_1, U_2, \ldots)$ are identically distributed. This process is Brownian motion, a process important enough to have its own chapter. The first problem will be addressed in the next section, and fortunately, the second problem can be resolved for a Feller process. Actions: For simplicity assumes there are only two actions; fish and not_to_fish. If $ Q $ has probability density function $ g $ with respect to the reference measure $ \lambda $, then the one-step transition density is \[ p(x, y) = g(y - x), \quad x, \, y \in S \]. Pretty soon, you have an entire system of probabilities that you can use to predictnot only tomorrow's weather, but the next day's weather, and the next day. For either of the actions it changes to a new state as shown in the transition diagram below. This one for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip4iSMRW5X4. The last result generalizes in a completely straightforward way to the case where the future of a random process in discrete time depends stochastically on the last $ k $ states, for some fixed $ k \in \N $. Once an action is taken the environment responds with a reward and transitions to the next state.